Three pillars – one standard
Creating structure where complexity emerges.
DR Consulting combines governance, architecture and independent assurance. The focus is on clear decisions, robust structures and SAP landscapes that remain manageable over the long term.
Request advisoryExpertise
01 | Governance
Structure. Control. Clarity.Governance creates the framework in which SAP decisions can be made transparently, consistently and with long-term viability.
In grown SAP landscapes, many risks do not arise from individual technical mistakes, but from unclear responsibilities, missing decision paths and inconsistent exceptions to standard.
Good governance does not mean more bureaucracy. It ensures that requirements, extensions, architecture topics and escalations are decided where responsibility, context and consequences come together.
Typical questions
- Who decides on deviations from standard, and based on which criteria?
- Which topics belong in the architecture board, and which deliberately do not?
- How does Clean Core remain more than a slogan in daily operations?
- How can external recommendations be assessed cleanly and transparently?
- Which escalation paths does operations need for critical architecture topics?
My focus
- Clean Core Governance Guardrails for extensions, deviations and decisions in the core.
- Decision Structures Roles, responsibilities, decision paths and escalation logic.
- Change & Architecture Boards Structuring committees, decision templates and evaluation logic.
- Governance Starter Building practical governance structures without unnecessary bureaucracy.
- S/4 Readiness Assessing decision maturity, risks and prerequisites for transformations.
The goal is better decision quality: clear, transparent and connected to operations, architecture and transformation.
02 | Architecture
Design. Integration. Direction.Architecture work makes visible which technical decisions have long-term consequences for operations, extensibility, integration and transformation.
DR Consulting supports companies in evaluating SAP, S/4HANA, BTP and integration decisions in a structured way when multiple systems, partners, data flows and business requirements converge.
This also applies to Business AI and automation scenarios. They only become viable when the data foundation, integration, responsibilities and operating model work together cleanly.
Typical questions
- Does the extension belong in the core or on BTP?
- Which integration option remains manageable and maintainable long term?
- Which architecture decision creates later operational or upgrade risks?
- Which assumptions are missing from the current solution or target picture?
- Which automation is meaningful for the business and fit for governance?
My focus
- SAP Architecture Advisory Assessment of target pictures, system boundaries, dependencies and architecture decisions.
- SAP BTP & Extension Strategy Classification of extension options, BTP services, Business AI scenarios and Clean Core implications.
- Integration Patterns Assessment of interface, API, event, workflow and automation approaches.
- Architecture Option Evaluation Comparison of alternative solution paths, including risks, assumptions and trade-offs.
- Systemic Manageability Architecture decisions viewed through operations, governance and future adaptability.
The goal is an architecture that not only works in the short term, but remains steerable, maintainable and adaptable over time.
03 | Assurance
Review. Risk. Decision.Assurance means independent assessment where decisions are critical, expensive or have long-term consequences.
DR Consulting evaluates risks, assumptions and decision maturity independently, without operational delivery responsibility and without commitment to a specific solution path.
This perspective is especially valuable when external recommendations, management documents or transformation decisions require an independent countercheck.
Typical questions
- Is the proposed solution path viable from a business and architecture perspective?
- Is the S/4HANA scenario mature enough for a management decision?
- Which risks are missing from the steering committee document?
- Where do technical debt or later operational risks emerge?
- Is the decision robust enough before implementation begins?
My focus
- Independent Quality Gates Structured assessment of critical project, architecture or transformation phases.
- Risk Reviews Making risks, dependencies, assumptions and blind spots visible.
- Second Opinion Independent assessment of external recommendations, architecture proposals or solution paths.
- Steering Advisory Targeted support for decision formats and management documents.
- Decision Workshops Structured clarification of blocked or difficult SAP decisions.
The goal is management confidence: not through more reporting, but through clear assessment, transparent risks and robust decision foundations.
Fixed-price entry packages
Structured entry packages are available for Clean Core, S/4HANA readiness and governance. They create clarity quickly and provide a robust foundation for the next steps.
Go to entry packages